4.7 Article

Study on drug screening multicellular model for colorectal cancer constructed by three-dimensional bioprinting technology

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOPRINTING
卷 9, 期 3, 页码 379-398

出版社

WHIOCE PUBL PTE LTD
DOI: 10.18063/ijb.694

关键词

3D bioprinting; Colorectal cancer; Multicellular model; Immune microenvironment

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The existing in vitro models for antitumor drug screening have limitations in predicting in vivo pharmacological effects. 3D bioprinting technology offers advantages in constructing human tissues compared to other methods. We used this technology to construct a 3D multicellular model and found improved expression of tumor-related genes compared to a 3D bioprinted single-cell model. The multicellular model also showed resistance to chemotherapy drugs, highlighting its potential in drug screening.
The existing in vitro models for antitumor drug screening have significant limitations. Many compounds that inhibit two-dimensional (2D) cultured cells do not exhibit the same pharmacological effects in vivo, thereby wasting human and material resources and time during drug development. Therefore, it is crucial to develop new models. Three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting technology has greater advantages in constructing human tissues than sandwich culture and organoid construction. We used 3D bioprinting technology to construct a 3D multicellular model of SW480 cells, tumor-associated macrophages, and endothelial cells. The biological activities of the model were evaluated by immunofluorescence, hematoxylin and eosin staining of frozen pathological sections, and transcriptome sequencing. Compared with 3D bioprinted single-cell model (3D printing-S), 3D bioprinted multicellular models (3D printing-M) showed significantly improved expression of tumor-related genes, including hub genes IL1B, FCGR2A, FCGR3A, CYBB, SPI1, CCL2, ITGAM, and ITGB2. Antitumor drug screening experiment showed that the IC50 values of 5-FU, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan in 3D printing-S group/2D culture group were 31.13 mu M/12.79 mu M, 26.79 mu M/0.80 mu M, and 16.73 mu M/10.45 mu M, respectively. Compared with the 3D printing-S group, 3D printing-M group was significantly more resistant to chemotherapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据