4.6 Article

Alleviating glucose repression and enhancing respiratory capacity to increase itaconic acid production

期刊

SYNTHETIC AND SYSTEMS BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 8, 期 1, 页码 129-140

出版社

KEAI PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.synbio.2022.12.007

关键词

Itaconic acid; Glucose repression; Signaling pathway

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to improve itaconic acid (IA) production in Saccha-romyces cerevisiae by increasing gene expressions related to glucose derepression without impairing yeast growth on glucose. Engineering the acetyl-CoA synthesis pathway increased the titer of IA, and knocking out a negative regulator of the mitochondrial retrograde signaling further increased IA production.
The Crabtree effect products ethanol and acetic acid can be used for itaconic acid (IA) production in Saccha-romyces cerevisiae. However, both the IA synthesis and oxidative phosphorylation pathways were hampered by glucose repression when glucose was used as the substrate. This study aimed to improve IA titer by increasing gene expressions related to glucose derepression without impairing yeast growth on glucose. Engineering the acetyl-CoA synthesis pathway increased the titer of IA to 257 mg/L in a urea-based medium. Instead of entire pathway overexpression, we found that some signaling pathways regulating glucose repression were effective targets to improve IA production and respiratory capacity. As a consequence of the reduced inhibition, IA titer was further increased by knocking out a negative regulator of the mitochondrial retrograde signaling MKS1. SNF1/MIG1 signaling was disturbed by deleting the hexokinase HXK2 or an endoplasmic reticulum membrane protein GSF2. The shaking results showed that XYY286 (BY4741, HO::cadA, Y::Dz.ada, 208a::Mt.acs, Delta hxk2, pRS415-cadA, pRS423-aac2) accumulated 535 mg/L IA in 168 h in the YSCGLU medium. qRT-PCR results verified that deletion of MKS1 or HXK2 upregulated the gene expressions of the IA synthesis and respiratory pathways during the growth on glucose.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据