4.8 Article

Thick Electrodes of a Self-Assembled MXene Hydrogel Composite for High-Rate Energy Storage

期刊

ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL MATERIALS
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/eem2.12653

关键词

energy storage; high-rate; hydrogel; MXene; self-assemble

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Supercapacitors based on two-dimensional MXene (Ti3C2Tz) exhibit excellent performance in ultrathin electrodes with low mass loading, but face limitations in high-rate performance and restacking of nanosheets. In this study, a vertically aligned MXene hydrogel composite was designed using thermal-assisted self-assembled gelation, providing enhanced electron transport and rapid ion transport. The resulting hydrogel electrode showed excellent performance in both aqueous and organic electrolytes, with high capacitance, stability, and high-rate capability for up to 300 μm thick electrodes, representing a significant step towards practical applications.
Supercapacitors based on two-dimensional MXene (Ti3C2Tz) have shown extraordinary performance in ultrathin electrodes with low mass loading, but usually there is a significant reduction in high-rate performance as the thickness increases, caused by increasing ion diffusion limitation. Further limitations include restacking of the nanosheets, which makes it challenging to realize the full potential of these electrode materials. Herein, we demonstrate the design of a vertically aligned MXene hydrogel composite, achieved by thermal-assisted self-assembled gelation, for high-rate energy storage. The highly interconnected MXene network in the hydrogel architecture provides very good electron transport properties, and its vertical ion channel structure facilitates rapid ion transport. The resulting hydrogel electrode show excellent performance in both aqueous and organic electrolytes with respect to high capacitance, stability, and high-rate capability for up to 300 mu m thick electrodes, which represents a significant step toward practical applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据