4.7 Article

Numerical Study of Nonadiabatic Wall Effects on Aerodynamic Characteristics of CHN-T1 Standard Model

期刊

AEROSPACE
卷 10, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/aerospace10040372

关键词

cryogenic wind tunnel; high Reynolds number; CHN-T1; temperature; numerical simulation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A numerical study was conducted to investigate the influence of nonadiabatic wall effects on the aerodynamic characteristics of a standard model in cryogenic wind tunnels. The results showed that the change in wall temperature significantly affected the surface pressure distribution, transition position, and skin-friction coefficient of the model, resulting in variations in lift and drag coefficients of the aircraft. The study also examined the influences of wall temperature gradients on the flow characteristics of both laminar and turbulent boundary layers.
Cryogenic wind tunnels provide the for possibility aerodynamic tests to take place over high Reynolds numbers by operating at a low gas temperature to meet the real flight simulation requirements, especially for state-of-the-art large transport aircrafts. However, undesirable temperature gradients between the test model and the surroundings will be caused by the thermal non-equilibrium, changing the boundary layer characteristics and resulting in test errors. To study the nonadiabatic wall effects on the aerodynamic characteristics of the model in cryogenic wind tunnels, a numerical study was carried out for the CHN-T1 standard model under different wall temperature gradients. A code with a finite volume method and gamma-Re-theta t transition model were used. The analysis concluded that the change in wall temperature significantly affects the surface pressure distribution, transition position and skin-friction coefficient of the model, thus varying the lift and drag coefficients of the aircraft. The influences on the flow characteristics of both laminar and turbulent boundary layers by the wall temperature gradient were also investigated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据