4.7 Article

Structurally stable electrospun nanofibrous cellulose acetate/chitosan biocomposite membranes for the removal of chromium ions from the polluted water

期刊

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1007/s42114-023-00680-x

关键词

Electrospinning; Nanofibrous membrane; Structural stability; Adsorption; Chromium ion

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cellulose acetate (CA) and chitosan (CS) were used to fabricate biobased porous nanofibers for chromium ion removal in water. The nanofibers showed excellent structural and thermal stability, with the addition of CS resulting in the formation of micro or nano-scale knots. The biocomposite nanofibrous membranes displayed high adsorption capacity and reusability for chromium ions, making them promising materials for water pollution treatment.
Cellulose acetate (CA) and chitosan (CS) were selected as the raw materials for preparing the biobased porous nanofibers for the removal of chromium ions in aqueous solutions. The structurally stable nanofibrous biocomposite membranes were successfully electrospun fabricated using a double-needle method. Nanoindentation mapping revealed that the micro or nano-scale knots were formed through a synergistic action of the hydrogen bonding, electrostatic forces, and interfacial compatibility of CA and CS. The average elastic modulus and hardness values of CA/CS biocomposite nanofibers were 0.23 GPa and 1.72 GPa, respectively. The nanofibrous membrane exhibited outstanding structural stability in an aqueous solution (with a wide pH range) and good thermal stability. The biocomposite nanofibrous membrane with 50% CS loading (BENF-50) had an optimum adsorption capacity of 51.6 mg/g for chromium ions in the aqueous solution at pH = 3 as well as good reusability of up to eight cycles. The fabricated biocomposite nanofibrous membranes showed excellent structural stability, thermal stability, and adsorption performance, making them promising adsorbent materials for treating water pollution.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据