4.8 Article

Mechanistic Insight into the Precursor Chemistry of Cesium Tin Iodide Perovskite Nanocrystals

期刊

ACS MATERIALS LETTERS
卷 5, 期 7, 页码 1954-1961

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsmaterialslett.3c00413

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Using a combination of spectroscopic techniques, we investigated the precursor chemistry of tin-based perovskite nanocrystals. We found that active intermediate complexes formed through the reaction of the iodide source with oligomers present in the tin(II) carboxylates play a key role in governing the reactivity of the tin iodide precursor, affecting the size, size uniformity, and photoluminescence quantum yield of the nanocrystals. Understanding the precursor chemistry is crucial for the design and synthesis of tin halide perovskite nanocrystals.
Colloidaltin halide perovskite nanocrystals (NCs) are of interestas an alternative to their lead-based counterparts. While some advancementshave been achieved in their synthetic development, the reaction mechanism,especially the precursor chemistry, of tin halide perovskite NCs remainspoorly understood. Here, using cesium tin iodide (CsSnI3) perovskite NCs as a model system, we report on the mechanisticinsight into the precursor chemistry of tin-based perovskite NCs througha combination of infrared, mass spectrometry, and nuclear magneticresonance spectroscopy. We identify that the active intermediate complexes,polymeric alkanoate iodides that form via the reaction of the iodidesource with oligomers present in the tin(II) carboxylates, play akey role in governing the reactivity of the tin iodide precursor,which leads to the variation in the size, size uniformity, and photoluminescencequantum yield of CsSnI3 NCs. Our work underscores the importanceof understanding the precursor chemistry as a key parameter to designand synthesize tin halide perovskite NCs, which not only aids in theirsyntheses by design but also might benefit the fabrication of high-qualitypolycrystalline tin-based films.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据