4.6 Article

Isolation, Purification, and Antitumor Activity of a Novel Active Protein from Antrodia cinnamomea Liquid Fermentation Mycelia

期刊

FERMENTATION-BASEL
卷 9, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/fermentation9020185

关键词

Antrodia cinnamomea active protein; antitumor activity; isolation and purification; apoptosis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Antrodia cinnamomea, a rare medicinal fungus in Taiwan, has strong antitumor and anti-inflammatory effects. A novel protein called ACAP was isolated and purified from the fungus and showed significant antitumor activity against three tumor cell lines. ACAP induced apoptosis in Hep G2 cells, upregulated p53, and downregulated caspase-3 expression. These findings suggest that ACAP has potential as a therapeutic agent or functional food.
Antrodia cinnamomea, a rare medicinal fungus endemic to Taiwan, contains numerous active components and displays strong antitumor and anti-inflammatory effects. We isolated and purified a novel A. cinnamomea active protein (termed ACAP) from liquid fermentation mycelia and evaluated its antitumor activity. A homogeneous protein-eluted fraction was obtained by anion exchange chromatography and gel filtration chromatography, and ACAP was identified based on the antitumor activity screening of this fraction. An in vitro assay of three tumor cell lines (HeLa, Hep G2, and Hepa 1-6) revealed significant antiproliferative effects of ACAP at low concentrations, with IC50 values of 13.10, 10.70, and 18.69 mu g/mL, respectively. Flow cytometric analysis showed that ACAP induced late apoptosis of Hep G2 cells. The apoptosis rate of 50 mu g/mL ACAP-treated cells (60%) was significantly (p < 0.01) more than that of the control. A Western blotting assay of apoptotic pathway proteins showed that ACAP significantly upregulated p53 and downregulated caspase-3 expression levels. Our findings indicate that ACAP has strong antitumor activity and the potential for development as a therapeutic agent and/or functional food.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据