4.6 Article

High-Performance Organic Field-Effect Transistors Using Rare Earth Metal Oxides as Dielectrics

期刊

ACS APPLIED ELECTRONIC MATERIALS
卷 5, 期 4, 页码 2000-2006

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsaelm.2c01334

关键词

organic electronics; organic field-effect transistors; organic semiconductors; rare earth metal oxides; high-k dielectrics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rare earth metal oxides (REOs) with high dielectric constants are proposed as promising gate dielectric materials for field-effect transistors. This paper presents a method for depositing uniform REO gate dielectric coatings by oxidizing thin rare earth metal films at relatively low temperatures. Extensive experiments on organic field-effect transistors (OFETs) demonstrate that OFETs with REO gate dielectrics exhibit considerably better characteristics compared to those with electrochemically grown aluminum oxide dielectric. The flexibility of OFETs on a plastic substrate makes this approach highly attractive for developing improved flexible and wearable electronic devices.
Rare earth metal oxides (REOs) represent promising gate dielectric materials for field-effect transistors due to their high dielectric constants required for suppressing leakage currents in devices. In this paper, we present an approach to deposition of uniform REO gate dielectric coatings by oxidation of thin rare earth metal films in air at relatively low temperatures (100-250 degrees C). The proposed methodology was extensively explored in organic field-effect transistors (OFETs) using five benchmark organic semiconductors and six REOs as gate dielectrics. It was shown that OFETs with the REO gate dielectrics deliver on average considerably better characteristics compared to the reference devices using electrochemically grown aluminum oxide dielectric (AlOx). OFETs on a flexible plastic substrate were demonstrated, which makes this approach very attractive for developing flexible and wearable electronic devices with improved performance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据