4.8 Article

The anorectic and thermogenic effects of pharmacological lactate in male mice are confounded by treatment osmolarity and co-administered counterions

期刊

NATURE METABOLISM
卷 5, 期 4, 页码 677-+

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s42255-023-00780-4

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lactate is a metabolite that affects energy balance, but its effects have been confounded by hypertonic injection solutions. This study highlights the importance of considering osmolarity and counterions in metabolite research.
Lactate is a circulating metabolite and a signalling molecule with pleiotropic physiological effects. Studies suggest that lactate modulates energy balance by lowering food intake, inducing adipose browning and increasing whole-body thermogenesis. Yet, like many other metabolites, lactate is often commercially produced as a counterion-bound salt and typically administered in vivo through hypertonic aqueous solutions of sodium l-lactate. Most studies have not controlled for injection osmolarity and the co-injected sodium ions. Here, we show that the anorectic and thermogenic effects of exogenous sodium l-lactate in male mice are confounded by the hypertonicity of the injected solutions. Our data reveal that this is in contrast to the antiobesity effect of orally administered disodium succinate, which is uncoupled from these confounders. Further, our studies with other counterions indicate that counterions can have confounding effects beyond lactate pharmacology. Together, these findings underscore the importance of controlling for osmotic load and counterions in metabolite research. Studies of the physiological effects of metabolites often rely on injections of metabolite salts. In this study, Lund et al. show that the hypertonicity of the injected solutions can drive the metabolic effects attributed to pharmacological administration of lactate. This work highlights the importance of taking treatment osmolarity and counterions into account in the experimental design.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据