4.6 Article

Eco-Efficiency Assessment Utilizing Recycled Glass Aggregate in Concrete

期刊

BUILDINGS
卷 13, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/buildings13040910

关键词

recycled glass aggregates; life cycle assessment; eco-efficiency; waste management; concrete; by-products

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper reviews the technical and eco-efficiency performance issues in using glass waste as an aggregate in concrete production. The study includes a life cycle assessment and eco-efficiency review of a potentially sustainable alternative to traditional concrete. The use of geopolymer concrete with recycled glass aggregate as a non-cement based alternative shows potential in reducing emissions, but faces challenges in other environmental impact areas.
This paper reviews specific technical and eco-efficiency performance issues in using glass waste as an aggregate in the production of concrete. Eco-efficiency is a relatively modern tool in the pursuit of sustainability. Eco-efficiency is the concept of maximising the benefits from the use of non-renewable resources while minimising the use of non-renewable resources. The paper details a life cycle assessment and eco-efficiency review of a potentially sustainable alternative to traditional concrete, made from ordinary Portland cement. The study follows the ISO framework, which includes goal and scope, a life cycle inventory, life cycle impact assessment, life cycle costing, normalising of data and the creation of an eco-efficiency portfolio. SimaPro life cycle assessment software has been used to further analyse the use of recycled glass aggregate as a replacement for naturally occurring stone aggregate in geopolymer concrete. The study found that the use of geopolymer concrete as a non-cement based alternative concrete was a viable way to reduce emissions with a high global warming potential but faced challenges in other environmental impact areas. There is a need for ongoing research and study on the application of eco-efficiency as a tool in the pursuit of sustainable practices in society.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据