4.7 Article

Isolation of lactic acid bacteria from plants of the coastal Satoumi regions for use as starter cultures in fermented milk and soymilk production

期刊

LWT-FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 68, 期 -, 页码 202-207

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2015.12.023

关键词

Lactobacillus plantarum; Lactococcus lactis; Satoumi; Fermented milk; Fermented soymilk

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture, Japan [25450300]
  2. Towa Foundation for Food Science & Research (Tokyo, Japan)
  3. Warehouse TERRADA, Tokyo, Japan
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [25450300] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Ministry of the Environment, Government of Japan, defines a Satoumi as a coastal area where biological productivity and biodiversity has increased through human intervention. To identify new starter cultures, we isolated and screened lactic acid bacteria (LAB) with acid resistance and lactose-utilising ability from 94 algal or plant samples obtained from five Satoumi regions in Japan. Among the 138 LAB isolates, 10 were identified as acid (pH 5.0)-tolerant and milk and/or soymilk-fermenting LAB. Among these, six isolates were identified as Lactobacillus plantarum, and four were identified as Lactococcus lactis, respectively. Of the selected strains, only two strains, Lc. lactis Miura-SU2 and Lc. lactis Boso-SU1, lowered milk pH and produced curd. Lc. lactis Miura-SU2 imparted a suitable flavour to the fermented milk. All of the 10 selected LAB showed soymilk fermentation capability. In addition, a suitable flavour was imparted to fermented soymilk by Lc. lactis Miura-SU2. Fermentation by Lb. plantarum Tennozu-SU1 clearly increased the superoxide anion radical scavenging capacity of soymilk. These results suggest that Lc. lactis Miura-SU2 and Lb. plantarum Tennozu-SU1 have potential for use as starter cultures and/or functional components for fermented milk and/or soymilk production. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据