4.5 Article

CVIK: A MATLAB-based cluster validity index toolbox for automatic data clustering

期刊

SOFTWAREX
卷 22, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.softx.2023.101359

关键词

Clustering; Cluster validity index; Automatic clustering

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We introduce CVIK, a MATLAB-based toolbox that helps with cluster analysis applications. This toolbox provides 28 cluster validity indices (CVIs) to measure clustering quality for data scientists, researchers, and practitioners. CVIK supports two approaches for automatic clustering: evaluating candidate clustering solutions from classical algorithms and assessing potential solutions in evolutionary clustering algorithms using optimization methods. It also includes different proximity measures for estimating data similarity, and can handle both feature data and relational data. The source code and examples are available in this GitHub repository: https://github.com/adanjoga/cvik-toolbox.
We present CVIK, a MATLAB-based toolbox for assisting the process of cluster analysis applications. This toolbox aims to implement 28 cluster validity indices (CVIs) for measuring clustering quality available to data scientists, researchers, and practitioners. CVIK facilitates implementing the entire pipeline of automatic clustering in two approaches: (i) evaluating candidate clustering solutions from classical algorithms, in which the number of clusters increases gradually, and (ii) assessing potential solutions in evolutionary clustering algorithms using single- and multi-objective optimization methods. This toolbox also implements distinct proximity measures to estimate data similarity, and the CVIs are capable of processing both feature data and relational data. The source code and examples can be found in this GitHub repository: https://github.com/adanjoga/cvik-toolbox. (c) 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据