4.5 Article

Pilot study of tocilizumab monotherapy for active chronic periaortitis

期刊

RMD OPEN
卷 9, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2023-003007

关键词

autoimmunity; autoimmune diseases; anti-inflammatory agents; non-steroidal; inflammation; low back pain

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the effectiveness and safety of TCZ monotherapy for CP patients at acute active stage. The results showed that after 3 months of TCZ treatment, 27.3% of patients achieved partial remission and 63.6% achieved complete remission, with a total remission rate of 90.9%. All patients reported improvement in clinical symptoms and inflammatory markers decreased to normal levels. Furthermore, 81.8% of patients showed significant shrinkage of perivascular mass.
Objectives To investigate the effectiveness and safety of TCZ (tocilizumab) monotherapy for chronic periaortitis (CP) patients at acute active stage. Methods Twelve patients with definite or possible diagnosis of CP were enrolled and received intravenous infusions of TCZ (8 mg/kg) every 4 weeks for at least 3 months. Clinical features, laboratory and imaging findings were recorded at baseline and during the follow-up. The primary endpoint was the rate of partial and complete remission after 3 months TCZ monotherapy and the secondary endpoint was the frequency of treatment related adverse events. Results Three patients (27.3%) achieved partial remission and seven patients (63.6%) obtained complete remission after 3 months TCZ treatment. The total remission rate achieved 90.9%. All patients reported improvement in clinical symptoms. Inflammatory markers such as erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C reactive protein decreased to normal levels after TCZ treatment. Nine patients (81.8%) showed remarkable shrinkage of perivascular mass greater than or equal to 50% on CT. Conclusion Our study showed that TCZ monotherapy contributed to remarkable clinical and laboratory improvement in CP patients and could be an alternative treatment option for CP.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据