4.7 Article

Fullerene-Based Nanosurfactant for the Automatic Homeotropic Alignment of Liquid Crystals

期刊

ACS APPLIED NANO MATERIALS
卷 6, 期 9, 页码 7942-7947

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsanm.3c00394

关键词

nanosurfactants; homeotropic alignment; liquid crystals; fullerene; self-assembly

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chemically functionalized organic-inorganic hybrid nanoparticles have been proposed for automatic liquid crystal (LC) alignment, but the challenge lies in achieving well-balanced self-assembly without wasting materials and causing harmful aggregation. In this paper, a promising homeotropic alignment (HA) nanosurfactant (C60D) with distinct molecular segments in LC affinity is introduced, which enables automatic construction of the HA nanolayer on the surface and guides the good alignment of LC molecules. The system exhibits exceptional material efficiency (0.01 wt %) and a reliable electro-optical switching modulator using C60D has been demonstrated. The developed HA-guide C60D nanosurfactant provides a way for LCD application and serves as a useful guideline for designing nanomaterials.
Chemically functionalized organic-inorganic hybrid nanoparticles have significant benefits for automatic liquid crystal (LC) alignment but are still limited to well-balanced self-assembly without wasting materials and deleterious aggregation for LC display. In this paper, we propose a promising homeotropic alignment (HA) guide nanosurfactant (C60D) consisting of different distinct molecular segments in LC affinity. By doping C60D into a nematic LC medium, the HA nanolayer is automatically constructed on the surface and guides the good alignment of LC molecules. Notably, this system exhibits exceptional material efficiency (0.01 wt %). Furthermore, it is demonstrated that an electro-optical switching modulator using C60D is reliably working. The precisely developed HA-guide C60D nanosurfactant will offer a way for LCD application as well as a useful guideline for designing nanomaterials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据