4.6 Article

On irregularity indices and main eigenvalues of graphs and their applicability

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING
卷 69, 期 3, 页码 2549-2571

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s12190-023-01845-z

关键词

Graph; Irregularity index; Main eigenvalue; QSPR model

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper extends the practical applicability of graph-theoretic irregularity indices in reticular chemistry by proposing a method to compute various irregularity indices of graphs using their main eigenvalues. The paper also determines the irregularity indices of several classes of graphs and proves a conjecture. Additionally, the paper provides regression modeling for irregularity indices with significant predictive potential.
Graph-theoretic irregularity indices have diverse applications in computer science. This paper extends their practical applicability in reticular chemistry. First, we put forward a method of computing various irregularity indices of graphs by means of their main eigenvalues. This presents applications of spectral graph theory in chemistry. We find parametric conditions for which the generalized friendship graphs, the join of two regular graphs, the corona of two regular graphs and the vertex-deleted subgraph of a strongly regular graph have exactly two distinct main eigenvalues. By computing the two main eigenvalues for these classes of graphs, we determine their certain irregularity indices. Our results generalize most of the results of Reti (Appl Math Comput 344-345:107-115, 2019), in which the author studied these irregularity indices for the complete bipartite graphs, friendship graphs and complete split graphs. More importantly, we prove a conjecture proposed in Reti (Appl Math Comput 344-345:107-115, 2019) stating that the complete split-like graphs have exactly two distinct main eigenvalues. At last, we provide the QSPR analysis with regression modeling for irregularity indices with significant predictive potential.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据