4.5 Review

Thirst in heart failure: A scoping review

期刊

NURSING OPEN
卷 10, 期 8, 页码 4948-4958

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/nop2.1818

关键词

fluid restriction; heart failure; intervention; self-care; symptom management; thirst

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study was to summarize the overall picture of thirst-related research in patients with heart failure. A scoping review was conducted using various databases and sources to identify relevant articles. The study identified three themes: incidence of thirst, thirst-related factors, and intervention measures in patients with heart failure.
AimThe aim of this study was to summarise the overall picture of thirst-related research in patients with heart failure. DesignWe conducted a scoping review following the Arskey and O'Malley methodological framework along with the PAGER framework. MethodsPubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, Embase, The Cochrane Library, Jonna Briggs Institute, ProQuest Database, Google Scholar, PsycINFO, PQDT, CNKI, Wan Fang, VIP and CBM. Additionally, grey literature including grey databases (Opengrey, OpenDoar, Openaire and BASEL Bielefeld Academic Search Engine), conferences or articles (Scopus and Microsoft Academic), graduate theses databases (eTHOS, DART Europe, Worldcat and EBSCO Open Dissertations) and government information media (UK guidance and regulations, USA government websites, EU Bookshop and UN official publications) were searched. The databases were searched from inception to 18 August 2022 for Articles written in English and Chinese. Two researchers independently screened articles based on inclusion and exclusion criteria, and a third researcher adjudicated disagreements. ResultsWe retrieved 825 articles, of which 26 were included. Three themes were summarised from these articles: (a) the incidence of thirst in patients with heart failure; (b) the thirst-related factors in patients with heart failure; and (c) the intervention measures of thirst in patients with heart failure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据