4.4 Article

Drain vs. no-drain for acetabular fractures after treatment via a modified stoppa approach: A retrospective study

期刊

FRONTIERS IN SURGERY
卷 10, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1133744

关键词

acetabular fracture; close suction drainage; modified stoppa approach; surgical method; treatment

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study was to compare the clinical efficacy of close suction drainage (CSD) and no-CSD after a modified Stoppa approach for the surgical fixation of acetabular fractures. The results showed that there were no significant differences in patient demographics, fracture characteristics, intraoperative indicators, reduction quality, clinical outcomes, and incision-related complications between the two groups. However, the use of CSD was associated with a significantly higher postoperative blood transfusion volume and rate, as well as higher postoperative temperatures and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores. Therefore, routine use of CSD should not be recommended for patients with acetabular fractures after surgical fixation using a modified Stoppa approach.
ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to compare the clinical efficacy of close suction drainage (CSD) and no-CSD after a modified Stoppa approach for the surgical fixation of acetabular fractures.MethodsThis retrospective study included 49 consecutive acetabular fracture patients, who presented to a single level I trauma center for surgical fixation, using a modified Stoppa approach from January 2018 to January 2021. All surgeries were performed by a senior surgeon using the same approach, and the patients were divided into two groups based on whether CSD was used after the operation. Details of the patient demographics, fracture characteristics, intraoperative indicators, reduction quality, intra and postoperative blood transfusion, clinical outcomes, and incision-related complications were collected. ResultsNo significant differences were found in the demographics, fracture characteristics, intraoperative indicators, reduction quality, clinical outcomes, and incision-related complications between the two groups (P > 0.05). The use of CSD was associated with a significantly higher postoperative blood transfusion volume (P = 0.034) and postoperative blood transfusion rate (P = 0.027). In addition, there was a significant difference in postoperative temperatures, especially on postoperative Day 2 (no-CSD 36.97 +/- 0.51 degrees C vs. CSD 37.34 +/- 0.69 degrees C, P = 0.035), and higher visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, especially on postoperative Day 1 (no-CSD 3.00 +/- 0.93 vs. CSD 4.14 +/- 1.43, P = 0.002) and 3 (no-CSD 1.73 +/- 0.94 vs. CSD 2.48 +/- 1.08, P = 0.013).ConclusionThe results of this study suggest that routine use of CSD should not be recommended for patients with acetabular fractures after surgical fixation using a modified Stoppa approach.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据