Efficacy and safety analysis of transarterial chemoembolization and transarterial radioembolization in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma descending hepatectomy

BACKGROUNDHepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common malignant tumors in the world, which is seriously threatening the lives of patients. Due to the rapid development of the disease, patients were in the middle and advanced stages at the time of diagnosis and missed the best time for treatment. With the development of minimally invasive medicine, interventional therapy for advanced HCC has achieved promising results. Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and transarterial radioembolization (TARE) are currently recognized as effective treatments. This study aimed to investigate the clinical value and safety of TACE alone and combined with TACE in the treatment of progression in patients with advanced HCC and to find a breakthrough for the early diagnosis and treatment of patients with advanced HCC.AIMTo investigate the efficacy and safety of hepatic TACE and TARE in advanced descending hepatectomy.METHODSIn this study, 218 patients with advanced HCC who were treated in the Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital from May 2016 to May 2021 were collected. Of the patients, 119 served as the control group and received hepatic TACE, 99 served as the observation group and were treated with hepatic TACE combined with TARE. The patients in two groups were compared in terms of lesion inactivation, tumor nodule size, lipiodol deposition, serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) level in different periods, postoperative complications, 1-year survival rate, and clinical symptoms such as liver pain, fatigue, and abdominal distension, and adverse reactions such as nausea and vomiting.RESULTSThe observation group and the control group had good efficacy in treatment efficiency, reduction of tumor nodules, reduction of postoperative AFP value, reduction of postoperative complications, and relief of clinical symptoms. In addition, compared with the control group, the treatment efficiency, reduction of tumor nodules, reduction of AFP value, reduction of postoperative complications, and relief of clinical symptoms in the observation group were better than those in the TACE group alone. Patients in the TACE + TARE group had a higher 1-year survival rate after surgery, lipiodol deposition was significantly increased and the extent of tumor necrosis was expanded. The overall incidence of adverse reactions in the TACE + TARE group was lower than that in the TACE group, and the difference had statistical significance (P < 0.05).CONCLUSIONCompared with TACE alone, TACE combined with TARE is more effective in the treatment of patients with advanced HCC. It also improves postoperative survival rate, reduces adverse effects, and has a better safety profile.

Automated summary

This study investigated the clinical value and safety of TACE alone and combined with TARE in the treatment of progression in patients with advanced HCC. The results showed that TACE combined with TARE is more effective in treating advanced HCC, improving postoperative survival rate, reducing adverse effects, and having a better safety profile.