4.5 Article

Relationship between Body Mass Index and Diagnosis of Overweight or Obesity in Veterans Administration Population

期刊

HEALTHCARE
卷 11, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11111529

关键词

obesity; overweight; morbid obesity; veterans; underdiagnosis; BMI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the gap between obesity and its diagnosis in the Veterans Administration (VA) population. It also identified factors associated with the underdiagnosis of obesity. The findings indicate that the underdiagnosis of obesity continues to be a significant problem, and accurate diagnosis is necessary for effective management and treatment.
Background: This paper examined the gap between obesity and its diagnosis for cohorts of patients with overweight, obesity, and morbid obesity in the Veterans Administration (VA) population. Using the risk adjustment models, it also identified factors associated with the underdiagnosis of obesity. Methods: Analysis was performed on a VA data set. We identified diagnosed patients and undiagnosed patients (identified through BMI but not diagnosed using ICD-10 codes). The groups' demographics were compared using nonparametric chi-square tests. We used logistic regression analysis to predict the likelihood of the omission of diagnosis. Results: Of the 2,900,067 veterans with excess weight, 46% were overweight, 46% had obesity, and 8% of them had morbid obesity. The overweight patients were the most underdiagnosed (96%), followed by the obese (75%) and morbidly obese cohorts (69%). Older, male, and White patients were more likely to be undiagnosed as overweight and obese; younger males were more likely to be undiagnosed as morbidly obese. (p < 0.05) Comorbidities significantly contributed to diagnosis. Conclusions: The underdiagnosis of obesity continues to be a significant problem despite its prevalence. Diagnosing obesity accurately is necessary to provide effective management and treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据