4.5 Article

Association of Multiple Cardiovascular Risk Factors with Musculoskeletal Function in Acute Coronary Syndrome Ward Inpatients

期刊

HEALTHCARE
卷 11, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11070954

关键词

coronary care units; muscle strength; rehabilitation; risk factors

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study explored the association between multiple risk factors and musculoskeletal function in adults hospitalized for acute coronary syndrome. The strongest linear association was found between drinking habits and the total number of cardiovascular disease risk factors, followed by smoking load. Furthermore, handgrip strength and respiratory muscle strength were associated with mean blood pressure, drinking habits, and body mass index.
This study explored the association of multiple risk factors with musculoskeletal function in adults hospitalized for acute coronary syndrome. Sixty-nine inpatients (55 +/- 6 years; 67% male) admitted to the cardiology ward within <12 h were assessed regarding stress, smoking, alcoholism, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and obesity. The musculoskeletal function was assessed by predicted values of handgrip strength of the dominant hand (HGS-D-%) and maximal inspiratory and expiratory pressures (MIP% and MEP%, respectively). After adjustment by age and sex, drinking habits showed the strongest linear association with the total number of cardiovascular disease risk factors [standardized beta, p-value] (beta = 0.110, p < 0.001), followed by smoking load (beta = 0.028, p = 0.009). Associations were also observed for HGS-D-% with mean blood pressure (beta = 0.019 [0.001; 0.037], p = 0.048); MIP% with mean blood pressure (beta = 0.025 [0.006; 0.043], p = 0.013); and MEP% with drinking habits (beta = 0.009 [0.002; 0.016], p = 0.013) and body mass index (beta = 0.008 [0.000; 0.015], p = 0.035). Peripheral and respiratory muscle strength must be interpreted in the context of its association with cardiovascular disease risk factors in adults hospitalized for acute coronary syndrome.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据