4.3 Article

Effect of interval and continuous small-sided games training on the bio-motor abilities of young soccer players: a comparative study

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13102-023-00664-w

关键词

Football; Body composition; Physical fitness; Aerobic power; Anaerobic power; Youth players

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The present study compared the effects of interval small-sided game (ISSG) and continuous small-sided game (CSSG) on the bio-motor abilities of young soccer players. The results showed that ISSG resulted in better improvements in anaerobic power and aerobic capacity compared to CSSG. Coaches and trainers may consider incorporating ISSG into training programs to enhance the bio-motor abilities of young soccer players.
ObjectiveThe present study compared the effects of two different small-sided game (SSG) training methods, interval (ISSG) and continuous (CSSG) on the bio-motor abilities of young soccer players.MethodsSixteen young soccer players (age: 19.5 +/- 0.5 years; height: 177 +/- 4.72 cm) were ranked based on the result of a running-based anaerobic sprint test (RAST) and randomly divided into two groups: CSSG (n = 8) and ISSG (n = 8). The training protocols were performed for eight weeks, three sessions per week. Participants were assessed twice (pre- and post-intervention) to estimate their anaerobic capacity with the RAST, aerobic capacity with Yo-Yo intermittent recovery test, body fat percentage with a bioimpedance analysis, speed with a 30-meter run test, and agility with the Illinois agility test. During the training session, the rating of the perceived exertion (RPE) and heart rate (mean and maximum) were recorded to assess the training load.ResultsIn general, aerobic and anaerobic capacities improved after ISSG (p < 0.05, for all). The between-group analysis with repeated measures ANOVA revealed higher values for ISSG than CSSG groups post-intervention in anaerobic power (p = 0.042, eta p(2) = 0.264). In addition, the independent t-test results indicated that ISSG presented lower values of mean heart rate (p = 0.023, effect size [ES] = 0.85) and RPE (p < 0.05, ES = 0.88) than CSSG. Moreover, higher values for maximum heart rate were revealed for ISSG than for the CSSG group (p = 0.004, ES = 0.85).ConclusionIn conclusion, the findings of this study suggests that ISSG can lead to better improvements in anaerobic power and aerobic capacity than CSSG. Additionally, the ISSG led to a lower mean heart rate and RPE than the CSSG. Therefore, coaches and trainers may want to consider incorporating ISSG into their training programs for young soccer players to enhance their bio-motor abilities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据