4.5 Article

Personal, Interpersonal, and Sociocultural Factors of Condom Use in Rural Indigenous Nahuas Adolescents in Mexico

期刊

CHILDREN-BASEL
卷 10, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/children10060921

关键词

adolescent; indigenous culture; condoms; sexual behavior

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The goal of this research was to determine the predictors of condom use among rural Indigenous adolescents. The predictor variables were selected from Bandura's Social Cognitive Theory and Leininger's Transcultural Theory. The study found that age at menarche/first ejaculation, attitude toward condom use, ethnic identity, and ability to negotiate condom use were significant predictors of condom use among the participants. This research provides a foundation for incorporating the cultural values of Indigenous adolescents into sexual health promotion interventions.
The goal of this research was to determine the personal, interpersonal, and sociocultural predictors of condom use among rural Indigenous adolescents. Predictor variables were selected from Bandura's Social Cognitive Theory and Leininger's Transcultural Theory. The sample consisted of 419 Nahuas adolescents randomly selected from the total number of neighborhood blocks in a rural community in Puebla, Mexico. The instruments had acceptable psychometric characteristics (Cronbach alpha and validity scores). Multiple linear regression models were used. Results: 56.8% of participants were female, and 50.40% were students. Mean age was M = 17.5 (SD = 0.97), and the majority (63%) identified as Catholic. Age at menarche/first ejaculation (& beta; = -1.2, p = 0.038), attitude toward condom use (& beta; = 0.13, p < 0.001), ethnic identity (& beta; = 0.21, p < 0.001), and ability to negotiate condom use (& beta; = 0.13, p = 0.003) predicted (R-2 = 22.3) condom use. This study provided a basis for integration of the cultural values of Indigenous adolescents within interventions for sexual health promotion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据