4.5 Article

Neonatal Outcomes of Term Infants Born with Meconium-Stained Amniotic Fluid

期刊

CHILDREN-BASEL
卷 10, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/children10050780

关键词

meconium-stained amniotic fluid; staging; outcome; infant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The severity of meconium-stained amniotic fluid during labor is independently correlated with adverse neonatal outcomes. Evaluating and grading meconium-stained amniotic fluid can help predict the condition of term infants and ensure immediate and proper neonatal care.
Background Meconium-stained amniotic fluid (MSAF) is considered an alarming sign of possible fetal compromise and it has recently been reported that neonatal outcome correlates with the degree of meconium thickness. Methods We retrospectively studied 400 term infants allocated in clear amniotic fluid and grade 1, 2, and 3 MSAF groups on the basis of color and thickness of AF. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the potential independent effect of delivery with MSAF of different severity on the risk of a composite adverse neonatal outcome. Results We found that delivery with grade 2 (OR 16.82, 95% Cl 2.12-33.52; p = 0.008) and 3 (OR 33.79, 95% Cl 4.24-69.33; p < 0.001) MSAF is independently correlated with the risk of adverse neonatal outcome, such as the occurrence of at least one of the following: need of resuscitation in the delivery room, blood cord pH < 7.100, occurrence of meconium aspiration syndrome (MAS), persistent pulmonary hypertension (PPH), transient tachypnea of the newborn (TTN), acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE), and sepsis. Conclusions There is a positive correlation between the severity of amniotic fluid meconium staining and thickness and the outcomes of term infants. Therefore, the evaluation and grading of MSAF during labor is useful in order to plan for the presence of a neonatologist at delivery for immediate and proper neonatal care.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据