4.5 Review

Maternal Infection and Preterm Birth: From Molecular Basis to Clinical Implications

期刊

CHILDREN-BASEL
卷 10, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/children10050907

关键词

preterm birth; prematurity; infection; inflammation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Preterm birth, a major public health concern worldwide, is the leading cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality. This review analyzes the association between infections and premature birth. Intrauterine infection/inflammation is commonly associated with spontaneous preterm birth. Inflammation-induced overproduction of prostaglandins can lead to uterine contractions and contribute to preterm delivery. Various pathogens, including Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Trichomonas vaginalis, Gardnerella vaginalis, Ureaplasma urealyticum, Mycoplasma hominis, Actinomyces, Candida spp., and Streptococcus spp., have been implicated in premature delivery, chorioamnionitis, and neonatal sepsis. Further research is needed to develop effective preventive methods and reduce neonatal morbidity.
As the leading cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality, preterm birth is recognized as a major public health concern around the world. The purpose of this review is to analyze the connection between infections and premature birth. Spontaneous preterm birth is commonly associated with intrauterine infection/inflammation. The overproduction of prostaglandins caused by the inflammation associated with an infection could lead to uterine contractions, contributing to preterm delivery. Many pathogens, particularly Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Trichomonas vaginalis, Gardnerella vaginalis, Ureaplasma urealyticum, Mycoplasma hominis, Actinomyces, Candida spp., and Streptococcus spp. have been related with premature delivery, chorioamnionitis, and sepsis of the neonate. Further research regarding the prevention of preterm delivery is required in order to develop effective preventive methods with the aim of reducing neonatal morbidity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据