4.5 Article

Root exudate composition from different plant species influences the growth of rhizosphere bacteria

期刊

RHIZOSPHERE
卷 25, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.rhisph.2022.100645

关键词

Soil; Rhizosphere microbes; Root exudate; Selection

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Plant roots release exudates that can fuel microbial activities and structure rhizosphere microbial communities, but it is not well understood how different plant species use their root exudate to potentially select for different soil microbes in the rhizosphere.
Plant roots release exudates that fuel microbial activities and can structure rhizosphere microbial communities, but how different plant species use their root exudate to potentially select for different soil microbes in the rhizosphere is not well understood. Here, we investigated how root exudate from plants of three diverging lineages, Lactuca sativa (lettuce), Brassica juncea (mustard cabbage), and Zea mays (maize) influence the growth of their own rhizosphere bacteria (host) and those from other plant species (non-host) in growth bioassays. We found that on the community level, lettuce rhizosphere bacteria grew better in non-host exudate, but mustard cabbage and maize rhizosphere bacteria grew similarly well in both host and non-host exudate. However, individual bacteria taxa showed strong preferences for exudate from different plant species. The bacterial growth patterns were independent of C and N quantity, suggesting that certain exometabolic compounds may drive the growth patterns. Our results demonstrate that root exudate from a given plant species have the potential to stimulate or suppress soil bacteria and hint at a mechanism that different plant species use to select for their specific suite of rhizosphere bacteria. These findings contribute to our broader understanding of how root exudate composition could be a mechanism that plants use to select for distinct microbial communities in the rhizosphere.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据