4.5 Article

Interpretation of Localized Surface Plasmonic Resonances of Gold Nanoparticles Covered by Polymeric Coatings

期刊

PHOTONICS
卷 10, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/photonics10040408

关键词

growth; gold; coatings; nanoparticles; optical properties; LSPR; RCWA

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this work, self-assembled gold nanoparticles were fabricated on heated glass substrates and covered with different polymers. The localized surface plasmon resonances of polymer-covered nanoparticles were recorded and analyzed, showing variations in width, intensity, and position according to factors such as nanoparticle size and refractive index of the polymer. The experimental results were justified and compared with rigorous theoretical calculations.
Plasmonic materials currently have a plethora of applications. How would a dielectric matrix, such as diblock copolymers, tune plasmonic properties? In this work, self-assembled gold nanoparticles were fabricated in medium vacuum conditions on heated Corning glass substrates (kept at 440 degrees C) under the coexistence of argon and air by means of DC magnetron sputtering. These samples were compared structurally and optically to samples deposited at room temperature and post annealed. Subsequently, the better of the two preparations, those deposited on heated glass, were covered with three different polymers, namely: Polystyrene-block-polybutadiene-block-polystyrene (PS-b-PBD-b-PS); Polystyrene-co-methyl methacrylate (PS-co-PMMA); and Polystyrene-block-polyisoprene-block-polystyrene (PS-b-PI-b-PS), by means of spin coating. Localized surface plasmon resonances were recorded and analyzed, respectively, for polymer-covered gold nanoparticles, with the width, intensity, and position of the resonances changing according to multiple factors, such as the nanoparticles size and the refractive index of each polymer. Lastly, for purposes of justification and comparison with the experimental results, rigorous theoretical calculations have been carried out.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据