We cannot turn back time: a framework for restoring and repairing rivers in the Anthropocene

Restoration activities commonly aim to reverse the impacts of environmental degradation and return a system back to an original, pre-disturbance condition. Is this realistic, achievable, or reflective of an unconscious bias in the Anthropocene, the current geological epoch where human disturbances dominate ecosystems? Billions of dollars are invested into river restoration globally each year, but there are limited empirical data to evaluate river recovery after these activities. Current response models, typically based on concepts of equilibrium and stability, assume rivers return to pre-disturbance conditions by removing or ameliorating a disturbance or stressor. Conceptual frameworks are useful tools to order phenomena and material, and understand patterns and processes in data-limited situations. A framework for the recovery of rivers in the Anthropocene is presented. The framework includes components of resilience thinking, landscape ecology, and river science. It is proposed that rivers in the Anthropocene have metamorphosed to a different basin of attraction (regime/state) displaying alternative functions, structures, and interactions. Resilience thinking suggests that once a river moves beyond the Anthropocene tipping point, recovery to its original state is not possible. If a river system cannot be returned to its original state, it must be repaired to something else. Using principles of landscape ecology for restoring structural and functional heterogeneity the capacity of Anthropocene rivers to withstand current and future disturbances would be enhanced. River science recognizes the significance of physical heterogeneity at multiple scales, resulting in differences in sensitivities to disturbance and associated recovery trajectories. All of these should guide the selection of river restoration activity types at given locations within a river network.

Automated summary

Restoration activities aim to reverse environmental degradation and return a system back to its original state, but this may not be realistic in the Anthropocene where human disturbances dominate ecosystems. Limited empirical data are available to evaluate river recovery after restoration activities, and current response models assume rivers return to pre-disturbance conditions. A framework for river recovery in the Anthropocene is proposed, incorporating resilience thinking, landscape ecology, and river science.