4.6 Article

Phytase Supplementation of Growing-Finishing Pig Diets with Extruded Soya Seeds and Rapeseed Meal Improves Bone Mineralization and Carcass and Meat Quality

期刊

LIFE-BASEL
卷 13, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/life13061275

关键词

pigs; phytase dosing; performance; fatty acid profile; meat quality; bone mineralization

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to investigate the effects of different doses of phytase on the growth performance, meat quality, bone mineralization, and fatty acid profiles of pigs fed with diets containing extruded soybean seeds and rapeseed meal. The results showed that phytase supplementation significantly improved the feed conversion ratio and meat color. It also increased the total phosphorus content in the bones and meat of pigs. Furthermore, the addition of phytase reduced the C22:4 n-6 acid content in the meat.
The aim of this study was to determine how different doses of phytase in diets with extruded soybean seeds and rapeseed meal affected pigs' growth performance, meat quality, bone mineralization, and fatty acid profiles. Sixty pigs were divided into three treatments by sex and body mass. Pigs were divided into starter (25 days), grower (36 days), and finisher (33 days) periods and fed with mash diets. No phytase was used in the control group diet, whereas in Phy1 and Phy2, 100 g and 400 g of phytase per ton of mixture were used, respectively. The feed conversion ratio and meat color were significantly correlated with phytase. Phytase supplementation had no effect on the growth of pigs, but total phosphorus was significantly increased in the bones and meat of the pigs. The enzyme additive reduced the C22:4 n-6 acid content in the meat, whereas other results were not significantly affected. The data suggest that the addition of phytase at a dosage of 100 g/ton to diets with extruded full-fat soya seeds and rapeseed meal can be valuable, as it reduces the FCR and increases the P content in the meat and bones.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据