4.6 Review

Diagnosis of Fibrotic Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis: Is There a Role for Biomarkers?

期刊

LIFE-BASEL
卷 13, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/life13020565

关键词

hypersensitivity pneumonitis; extrinsic allergic alveolitis; pulmonary fibrosis; biomarkers; early diagnosis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hypersensitivity pneumonitis is a complex lung syndrome characterized by sensitization to a specific antigen. The early identification of the antigen is important for improved outcomes, but there is a lack of consensus on diagnostic biomarkers. Current evidence gaps include lack of validation, small sampling, and overlapping mechanisms of inflammation and fibrogenesis.
Hypersensitivity pneumonitis is a complex interstitial lung syndrome and is associated with significant morbimortality, particularly for fibrotic disease. This condition is characterized by sensitization to a specific antigen, whose early identification is associated with improved outcomes. Biomarkers measure objectively biologic processes and may support clinical decisions. These tools evolved to play a crucial role in the diagnosis and management of a wide range of human diseases. This is not the case, however, with hypersensitivity pneumonitis, where there is still great room for research in the path to find consensual diagnostic biomarkers. Gaps in the current evidence include lack of validation, validation against healthy controls alone, small sampling and heterogeneity in diagnostic and classification criteria. Furthermore, discriminatory accuracy is currently limited by overlapping mechanisms of inflammation, damage and fibrogenesis between ILDs. Still, biomarkers such as BAL lymphocyte counts and specific serum IgGs made their way into clinical guidelines, while others including KL-6, SP-D, YKL-40 and apolipoproteins have shown promising results in leading centers and have potential to translate into daily practice. As research proceeds, it is expected that the emergence of novel categories of biomarkers will offer new and thriving tools that could complement those currently available.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据