4.6 Article

Nanopublication-based semantic publishing and reviewing: a field study with formalization papers

期刊

PEERJ COMPUTER SCIENCE
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PEERJ INC
DOI: 10.7717/peerj-cs.1159

关键词

Semantic publishing; Nanopublications; Structured peer-reviewing; Super-pattern

向作者/读者索取更多资源

With the increasing amount of scientific literature, it is challenging for researchers to keep up with the latest findings in their field. Existing approaches to process scientific articles automatically have poor accuracy beyond basic tasks. This study proposes a step towards machine-interpretable publication of high-level scientific claims by demonstrating the feasibility of formally publishing them in a special issue using nanopublications. The evaluation shows the technical and practical feasibility, indicating the potential to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of scientific research as a whole.
With the rapidly increasing amount of scientific literature, it is getting continuously more difficult for researchers in different disciplines to keep up-to-date with the recent findings in their field of study. Processing scientific articles in an automated fashion has been proposed as a solution to this problem, but the accuracy of such processing remains very poor for extraction tasks beyond the most basic ones (like locating and identifying entities and simple classification based on predefined categories). Few approaches have tried to change how we publish scientific results in the first place, such as by making articles machine-interpretable by expressing them with formal semantics from the start. In the work presented here, we propose a first step in this direction by setting out to demonstrate that we can formally publish high-level scientific claims in formal logic, and publish the results in a special issue of an existing journal. We use the concept and technology of nanopublications for this endeavor, and represent not just the submissions and final papers in this RDF-based format, but also the whole process in between, including reviews, responses, and decisions. We do this by performing a field study with what we call formalization papers, which contribute a novel formalization of a previously published claim. We received 15 submissions from 18 authors, who then went through the whole publication process leading to the publication of their contributions in the special issue. Our evaluation shows the technical and practical feasibility of our approach. The participating authors mostly showed high levels of interest and confidence, and mostly experienced the process as not very difficult, despite the technical nature of the current user interfaces. We believe that these results indicate that it is possible to publish scientific results from different fields with machine-interpretable semantics from the start, which in turn opens countless possibilities to radically improve in the future the effectiveness and efficiency of the scientific endeavor as a whole.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据