4.6 Article

Improved angelization technique against background knowledge attack for 1:M microdata

期刊

PEERJ COMPUTER SCIENCE
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PEERJ INC
DOI: 10.7717/peerj-cs.1255

关键词

Security; Privacy; Internet of Things (IoT); Anonymity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

With the development of modern information systems, sharing Electronic Health Records (EHRs) among different organizations has become important for medical treatment and analysis. However, privacy concerns and data utility are challenges that need to be addressed. This article focuses on the utility loss and privacy issues in sharing datasets with multiple records, and proposes an improved algorithm to better preserve privacy and utility.
With the advent of modern information systems, sharing Electronic Health Records (EHRs) with different organizations for better medical treatment, and analysis is bene-ficial for both academic as well as for business development. However, an individual's personal privacy is a big concern because of the trust issue across organizations. At the same time, the utility of the shared data that is required for its favorable use is also important. Studies show that plenty of conventional work is available where an individual has only one record in a dataset (1:1 dataset), which is not the case in many applications. In a more realistic form, an individual may have more than one record in a dataset (1:M). In this article, we highlight the high utility loss and inapplicability for the 1:M dataset of the 0-Sensitive k-Anonymity privacy model. The high utility loss and low data privacy of (p, l)-angelization, and (k, l)-diversity for the 1:M dataset. As a mitigation solution, we propose an improved (0*, k)-utility algorithm to preserve enhanced privacy and utility of the anonymized 1:M dataset. Experiments on the real -world dataset reveal that the proposed approach outperforms its counterpart, in terms of utility and privacy for the 1:M dataset.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据