4.5 Article

Lignin Recovery from Black Liquor Using Integrated UF/NF Processes and Economic Analysis

期刊

MEMBRANES
卷 13, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/membranes13020237

关键词

crossflow filtration; fouling; integrated UF/NF process; lignin; mixed matrix membranes; economic analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the recovery of lignin from black liquor using nanofiltration. The highest lignin rejection rate was observed at a pressure of 12 bar. Furthermore, an economic evaluation showed that although the cost of nanofiltration membranes is relatively high, the process of recovering lignin and hemicellulose is economically feasible.
Lignin is a polyphenolic biopolymer present in large amounts in black liquor (BL). This work investigated the recovery of lignin from BL (pre-filtered by ultrafiltration (UF)) by nanofiltration (NF). For the NF tests, laboratory-made mixed matrix membrane (MMM) prepared with 0.1% activated carbon (AC) nanoparticles were used in crossflow filtration mode. The effect of pressure (6-15 bar) and volume reduction (VR) (similar to 65%) were analyzed, and the filtration performance was evaluated in terms of permeate flux, lignin rejection rate, and flux reduction. The lignin rejection rate varied in the range of 67-80% with the pressure, however, the highest increases in flux and rejection were observed at 12 bar, which was found to be the optimum pressure. At a VR of similar to 65%, the permeate flux decreased by similar to 55% and the lignin rejection rate increased from 78% to 86%. In addition, an economic evaluation was performed for the preparation of UF and NF MMM. The minimum-to-maximum price range was estimated considering the costs of the laboratory and commercial grade regents. It showed a difference of similar to 10-fold and similar to 14-fold for UF and NF membranes, respectively. The results of the laboratory-scale study were used to evaluate the economic feasibility of the process for recovering lignin- and hemicellulose-rich retentate streams.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据