4.5 Review

N-Doped Graphene and Its Derivatives as Resistive Gas Sensors: An Overview

期刊

CHEMOSENSORS
卷 11, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/chemosensors11060334

关键词

graphene; reduced graphene oxide; nitrogen; doping; DFT; gas sensor

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Resistance gas sensors based on metal oxides are widely used, but their high operating temperature calls for alternative materials. Graphene and its derivatives have shown promise in gas sensing due to their 2D structure with high surface area and sensitivity to carrier concentration changes. N-doping of graphene can enhance gas-sensing features by inducing band gaps, generating defects, and improving conductivity. This article discusses the gas-sensing properties of N-doped graphene, covering both experimental and theoretical studies.
Today, resistance gas sensors which are mainly realized from metal oxides are among the most used sensing devices. However, generally, their sensing temperature is high and other materials with a lower operating temperature can be an alternative to them. Graphene and its derivatives with a 2D structure are among the most encouraging materials for gas-sensing purposes, because a 2D lattice with high surface area can maximize the interaction between the surface and gas, and a small variation in the carrier concentration of graphene can cause a notable modulation of electrical conductivity in graphene. However, they show weak sensing performance in pristine form. Hence, doping, and in particular N doping, can be one of the most promising strategies to enhance the gas-sensing features of graphene-based sensors. Herein, we discuss the gas-sensing properties of N-doped graphene and its derivatives. N doping can induce a band gap inside of graphene, generate defects, and enhance the conductivity of graphene, all factors which are beneficial for sensing studies. Additionally, not only is experimental research reviewed in this review paper, but theoretical works about N-doped graphene are also discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据