4.5 Article

A Paper-Chip-Based Phage Biosensor Combined with a Smartphone Platform for the Quick and On-Site Analysis of E. coli O157:H7 in Foods

期刊

CHEMOSENSORS
卷 11, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/chemosensors11020151

关键词

POCT assay; paper-chip-based phage biosensor; smartphone; E; coli O157; H7; foods

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A paper-based fluorescent phage biosensor was developed for the rapid and specific detection of virulent E. coli O157:H7 strain in food samples. The biosensor utilized a novel fluorescent probe and a micro-porous membrane filter to retain the targeted complex on a paper chip. The detection limit was as low as 50 CFU/mL, showing potential application for point-of-care testing of virulent E. coli in foods.
The rapid and specific point-of-care (POC) analysis of virulent pathogenic strains plays a key role in ensuring food quality and safety. In this work, a paper-based fluorescent phage biosensor was developed for the detection of the virulent E. coli O157:H7 strain (as the mode of virulent pathogens) in food samples. Firstly, phages that can specifically combine with E. coli O157:H7 (E. coli) were stained with SYTO-13 dye to prepare a novel fluorescent probe (phage@SYTO). Simultaneously, a micro-porous membrane filter with a pore size of 0.45 mu m was employed as a paper chip so as to retain the E. coli-phage@SYTO complex (> 1.2 mu m) on its surface. The phage@SYTO (200 nm in size) was able to pass through the pores of the chip, and the complex could be retained on the paper chip using the free phage@SYTO probes. The E. coli-phage@SYTO could emit a visual fluorescent signal (excited at 365 nm; emitted at 520 nm) onto the chip, which could be detected by a smartphone to reflect the concentration of E. coli. Under optimized conditions, the detection limit was as low as 50 CFU/mL (S/N = 3) and exhibited a wide linear range from 10(2) to 10(6) CFU/mL. The sensor has potential application value for the quick and specific POCT detection of virulent E. coli in foods.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据