4.5 Article

Characterization of gut microbial and metabolite alterations in faeces of Goto Kakizaki rats using metagenomic and untargeted metabolomic approach

期刊

WORLD JOURNAL OF DIABETES
卷 14, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

BAISHIDENG PUBLISHING GROUP INC
DOI: 10.4239/wjd.v14.i3.255

关键词

Type 2 diabetes mellitus; Gut microbial; Metabolites; Goto-Kakizaki rats; Metagenomics; Untargeted metabolomics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent studies have shown that type 2 diabetes is associated with the composition of gut microbiota and metabolites. In this study, GK rats were used as a model to evaluate the alterations in gut microbes and metabolites. Metagenomics and untargeted metabolomics were employed to analyze the faecal samples of GK rats, and it was found that the model group displayed significant differences in several glucose-related indexes and a shift in the gut microbiota structure compared to the control group.
BACKGROUND In recent years, the incidence of type 2 diabetes (T2DM) has shown a rapid growth trend. Goto Kakizaki (GK) rats are a valuable model for the study of T2DM and share common glucose metabolism features with human T2DM patients. A series of studies have indicated that T2DM is associated with the gut microbiota composition and gut metabolites. We aimed to systematically characterize the faecal gut microbes and metabolites of GK rats and analyse the relationship between glucose and insulin resistance. AIM To evaluate the gut microbial and metabolite alterations in GK rat faeces based on metagenomics and untargeted metabolomics. METHODS Ten GK rats ( model group) and Wistar rats (control group) were observed for 10 wk, and various glucose-related indexes, mainly including weight, fasting blood glucose (FBG) and insulin levels, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) and homeostasis model assessment of beta cell (HOMA-beta) were assessed. The faecal gut microbiota was sequenced by metagenomics, and faecal metabolites were analysed by untargeted metabolomics. Multiple metabolic pathways were evaluated based on the differential metabolites identified, and the correlations between blood glucose and the gut microbiota and metabolites were analysed. RESULTS The model group displayed significant differences in weight, FBG and insulin levels, HOMA-IR and HOMA-beta indexes (P < 0.05, P < 0.01) and a shift in the gut microbiota structure compared with the control group. The results demonstrated significantly decreased abundances of Prevotella sp. CAG: 604 and Lactobacillus murinus (P < 0.05) and a significantly increased abundance of Allobaculum stercoricanis (P < 0.01) in the model group. A correlation analysis indicated that FBG and HOMA- IR were positively correlated with Allobaculum stercoricanis and negatively correlated with Lactobacillus murinus. An orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis suggested that the faecal metabolic profiles differed between the model and control groups. Fourteen potential metabolic biomarkers, including glycochenodeoxycholic acid, uric acid, 13(S)- hydroxyoctadecadienoic acid (HODE), N-acetylaspartate, beta-sitostenone, sphinganine, 4-pyridoxic acid, and linoleic acid, were identified. Moreover, FBG and HOMA- IR were found to be positively correlated with glutathione, 13( S)-HODE, uric acid, 4-pyridoxic acid and allantoic acid and negatively correlated with 3- alpha, 7-alpha, chenodeoxycholic acid glycine conjugate and 26-trihydroxy-5-beta-cholestane (P < 0.05, P < 0.01). Allobaculum stercoricanis was positively correlated with linoleic acid and sphinganine ( P < 0.01), and 2-methyl- 3-hydroxy- 5-formylpyridine-4- carboxylate was negatively associated with Prevotella sp. CAG:604 (P < 0.01). The metabolic pathways showing the largest differences were arginine biosynthesis; primary bile acid biosynthesis; purine metabolism; linoleic acid metabolism; alanine, aspartate and glutamate metabolism; and nitrogen metabolism. CONCLUSION Metagenomics and untargeted metabolomics indicated that disordered compositions of gut microbes and metabolites may be common defects in GK rats.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据