4.3 Review

Cardiovascular Impact of Calcium and Vitamin D Supplements: A Narrative Review

期刊

ENDOCRINOLOGY AND METABOLISM
卷 38, 期 1, 页码 56-68

出版社

KOREAN ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.3803/EnM.2022.1644

关键词

Calcium; Vitamin D; Osteoporotic fractures; Osteoporosis; Myocardial infarction; Stroke

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Calcium and vitamin D play important roles in mineral homeostasis and skeletal health. The effectiveness and cardiovascular safety of their supplementation have been studied in various trials, yielding inconsistent results. Current guidelines recommend up to 1,200 mg of calcium intake from the diet without concern for cardiovascular risk. Recommendations for vitamin D supplementation vary widely, but well-conducted randomized trials suggest that modest supplementation is safe but does not provide cardiovascular benefits or harms.
Calcium and vitamin D play an important role in mineral homeostasis and the maintenance of skeletal health. Calcium and vitamin D supplements have been widely used for fracture prevention in elderly populations. Many trials have studied the effectiveness and cardiovascular safety of calcium and vitamin D supplementation, with disparate results. In this review, we summarize the most im-portant trials and systematic reviews. There is significant heterogeneity in clinical trial design, differences in the nature of trial out-comes (self-reported vs. verified), prior calcium intake, and trial size. Inconsistent results have been reported concerning the effects of calcium and vitamin D supplementation on cardiovascular outcomes. Most current guidelines recommend calcium intake of up to 1,200 mg daily, preferably from the diet, without concern for cardiovascular risk. Recommendations regarding vitamin D supple-mentation vary widely. There is compelling evidence from well-conducted randomized trials that modest vitamin D supplementation is safe but does not confer cardiovascular benefit or cardiovascular harm.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据