4.7 Review

The Skin Sensitisation of Cosmetic Ingredients: Review of Actual Regulatory Status

期刊

TOXICS
卷 11, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/toxics11040392

关键词

skin sensitization; safety assessment; cosmetic; regulatory status; alternative methods; structure alerts; AOP; IATA; NGRA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The EU cosmetics legislation requires skin sensitisation assessment for all cosmetics ingredients, and the evaluation should be performed using scientifically and regulatory body-accepted methods. Previous animal and human testing methods have raised ethical and practical concerns. Alternative methods have been developed and accepted, but concerns still exist regarding the presence of strong sensitisers in cosmetics formulations and the industry's risk management practices. This review aims to provide an overview of skin sensitisation assessment methods and explore the most potent skin sensitisers used in cosmetics.
All cosmetics products must be safe under foreseeable conditions of use. Allergenic responses are one of the most frequent adverse reactions noted for cosmetics. Thus, the EU cosmetics legislation requires skin sensitisation assessment for all cosmetics ingredients, including the regulated ones (for which the full toxicological dossier needs to be analysed by the Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS)) and those (perceived as less toxic) which are assessed by industrial safety assessors. Regardless of who performs the risk assessment, it should be carried out using scientifically and regulatory body-accepted methods. In the EU, reference methods for chemical toxicity testing are defined in the relevant Annexes (VII-X) of the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) Regulation. Recommendations for Skin Sensitization (Skin Sens) testing are provided in Annex VII, and this particular endpoint information is required for all EU-registered chemicals. Historically, in vivo animal and human methods have been used. Both raise ethical doubts, and some of them cause practical problems in the objective analysis of skin sensitising potency. Previous decades of huge effort have resulted in the regulatory acceptance of the alternative Skin Sens IATA (Integrated Approaches to Testing and Assessment) and NGRA (Next Generation Risk Assessment). Regardless of the testing issues, a serious sociological problem are observed within the market: the consumer assumes the presence of strong sensitisers in cosmetics formulations and insufficient risk management tools used by the industry. The present review aims to provide an overview of methods for assessing skin sensitisation. Additionally, it aims to answer the following question: what are the most potent skin sensitisers used in cosmetics? The answer considers the mechanistic background along with the actual regulatory status of ingredients and practical examples of responsible industry solutions in the area of risk management.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据