4.6 Article

Interaction Control for Tool Manipulation on Deformable Objects Using Tactile Feedback

期刊

IEEE ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION LETTERS
卷 8, 期 5, 页码 2700-2707

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/LRA.2023.3257680

关键词

Robots; Force; Tactile sensors; Planning; Nose; Task analysis; Films; Force and tactile sensing; force control; contact modeling

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A tactile-guided planning and control framework using GTac, a heterogeneous tactile sensor, is proposed for robots to perform delicate tasks on deformable objects. The framework accurately estimates the contact angle, achieves excellent tracking performance, and robust force control.
The human sense of touch enables us to perform delicate tasks on deformable objects and/or in a vision-denied environment. To achieve similar desirable interactions for robots, such as administering a swab test, tactile information sensed beyond the tool-in-hand is crucial for contact state estimation and contact force control. In this letter, a tactile-guided planning and control framework using GTac, a heteroGeneous Tactile sensor tailored for interaction with deformable objects beyond the immediate contact area, is proposed. The biomimetic GTac in use is an improved version optimized for readout linearity, which provides reliability in contact state estimation and force tracking. A tactile-based classification and manipulation process is designed to estimate and align the contact angle between the tool and the environment. Moreover, a Koopman operator-based optimal control scheme is proposed to address the challenges in nonlinear control arising from the interaction with the deformable object. Finaly, several experiments are conducted to verify the effectiveness of the proposed framework. The experimental results demonstrate that the proposed framework can accurately estimate the contact angle as well as achieve excellent tracking performance and strong robustness in force control.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据