4.7 Article

Flooding risk of cropland areas by repiquetes in the western Amazon basin: A case study of Peruvian Tamshiyacu City

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrh.2023.101428

关键词

Repiquetes; Riparian agriculture; Rainfall; Flooding risk; Western Amazon

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study assessed the repiquete flooding risk in riparian crop areas in the western Amazon basin. The study used statistical analyses, hydraulic modeling, and climatological assessments to analyze repiquete events. The findings show that the frequency and risk of repiquete flooding vary among different elevation ranges in the riparian crop areas.
Study region: The western Amazon basin at Tamshiyacu gauging station (near the Iquitos City) hosts floodplain agriculture that can be affected by the sudden reversal in direction of water levels known as repiquetes that produce intermittent flooding.Study focus: This study assesses repiquete flooding risk in riparian crop areas based on statistical analyses of repiquete events registered from 1996 to 2018, hydraulic modeling to estimate flooded extension, and assessment of climatological characteristics during the formation of repiquetes.New hydrological insights: Floods (& GE; 20 cm) produced by repiquetes in riparian crop areas between 83.00 and 88.00 m above sea level (masl) occur 1.8 times per year. However, not all elevation ranges have the same flooding risk to crops. Terrain elevations between 85.31 and 87.00 masl have a reduced flooding risk of 0.35 per year. Likewise, areas with elevations between 87.00 and 88.00 masl (43% of the total area) were not affected by repiquetes. Extreme repiquetes (study cases of 2002 and 2008) have been influenced by the increase of atmospheric moisture flux convergence and precipitation over both the northern Ucayali and Maran & SIM;& PRIME;on basins through the six previous days. Flood impacts from the extreme event of 2002 (2008) could have reached 40% (25%) of the available area for agriculture at the initiation of the repiquete.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据