Energy transition pathways for the Nigerian Road Transport: Implication for energy carrier, Powertrain technology, and CO2 emission

Climate change necessitates an energy transition; however, this transition is not a rapid process and may differ in pace and pathway for different countries, especially petroleum-dependent developing countries like Nigeria. Hence, this study aims to analyse the energy, economic and environmental implications of adopting alternative transition fuels and powertrains for transport in the Nigerian context in a subsidy and subsidy-exempt regime. The fuel options include compressed natural gas and electricity from renewable sources, natural gas, and coal, while the powertrains include internal combustion engines, hybrid electric, and battery electric vehicles. The re-sults indicate that switching to natural gas resulted in resource conservation (33 %) and emission reduction (52 %), and the proposed dedicated CNG and CNG hybrid electric Powertrain options offered the lowest levelised costs of driving (US$0.27/km & US$0.25/km, respectively). Electrified transport presented the most significant emissions savings (up to 98 %) except for using coal. However, the unit-levelised costs were higher than using CNG; hence, they are proposed as long-term solutions. The study also suggested subsidy removal and other ini-tiatives to promote the adoption of low-carbon fuels and Powertrain alternatives in Nigeria.(c) 2023 Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Automated summary

Climate change necessitates an energy transition, and this study focuses on analyzing the energy, economic, and environmental implications of adopting alternative transition fuels and powertrains for transport in Nigeria. The results show that switching to natural gas can conserve resources and reduce emissions, with dedicated compressed natural gas options offering the lowest costs of driving. Electrified transport presents significant emissions savings, except when using coal, but the unit-levelized costs are higher compared to compressed natural gas.