4.7 Article

Thermal stability, porosity, and catalytic activity of compound formed in a CaO-SiO2-Cu(NO3)2-H2O system

期刊

SURFACES AND INTERFACES
卷 37, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfin.2023.102696

关键词

Calcium silicate hydrate; Adsorption-desorption isotherms; BET analysis; Catalytic activity; Copper ions

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the properties and catalytic activity of calcium silicate hydrates with copper oxide. The catalyst was synthesized using the hydrothermal method. The results showed that a mixture of copper oxide and semicrystalline calcium silicate hydrates was obtained. The synthesized mesoporous sample exhibited a significantly high specific surface area and promising catalytic performance.
This study examined the properties and catalytic activity of calcium silicate hydrates with copper oxide in detail. The hydrothermal method was employed to conduct the synthesis of the catalyst. The molar ratio of CaO/ amorphous SiO2 = 1.5 was used. It was subsequently mixed with Cu(NO3)2 solution (c = 10 g Cu2+/dm3) to obtain the solution/solid ratio 10.0:1. A 16 h-long session of hydrothermal treatment was performed in unstirred suspensions at 175 degrees C. Raw materials were found to react fully in the course of hydrothermal synthesis, and a mixture of copper oxide and semicrystalline calcium silicate hydrates was obtained. The results of in situ X-ray diffraction and thermal analysis showed that copper oxide was stable under all the experimental conditions, whereas calcium silicate hydrates recrystallized to calcium silicates at 800 degrees C. During calcination, the synthetic mesoporous sample became non-porous, with a significantly high specific surface area compared to other cal-cium silicates. Propanol oxidation experiments showed that both synthetic and calcined samples are promising catalysts for VOC oxidation reactions. Six methods in total (FT-IR, STA, XRD, TEM, SEM, and BET) along with propanol oxidation experiments served to confirm the obtained results.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据