4.7 Article

Correlated variability in primate superior colliculus depends on functional class

期刊

COMMUNICATIONS BIOLOGY
卷 6, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s42003-023-04912-0

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Correlated variability in neuronal activity can constrain information readout from populations of neurons. Traditionally, it is reported as a single value summarizing a brain area, but this may obscure underlying features. In the macaque superior colliculus, different functional classes of neurons exhibit distinct levels of correlated variability, with delay class neurons showing the highest levels during working memory tasks. Considering functional subpopulations is important for understanding population coding principles.
Correlated variability in neuronal activity (spike count correlations, r(SC)) can constrain how information is read out from populations of neurons. Traditionally, r(SC) is reported as a single value summarizing a brain area. However, single values, like summary statistics, stand to obscure underlying features of the constituent elements. We predict that in brain areas containing distinct neuronal subpopulations, different subpopulations will exhibit distinct levels of r(SC) that are not captured by the population r(SC). We tested this idea in macaque superior colliculus (SC), a structure containing several functional classes (i.e., subpopulations) of neurons. We found that during saccade tasks, different functional classes exhibited differing degrees of r(SC). Delay class neurons displayed the highest r(SC), especially during saccades that relied on working memory. Such dependence of r(SC) on functional class and cognitive demand underscores the importance of taking functional subpopulations into account when attempting to model or infer population coding principles. Electrophysiological recordings in the macaque superior colliculus reveal that correlated variability (r(SC)) depends on functional class.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据