4.6 Article

Integrative Taxonomy of Novel Diaporthe Species Associated with Medicinal Plants in Thailand

期刊

JOURNAL OF FUNGI
卷 9, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jof9060603

关键词

Asexual morph; classification; Diaporthaceae; new host records; saprobes

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Five new Diaporthe species were discovered on medicinal plants in Thailand and described using morphology, culture characteristics, host association, and DNA analysis. The study revealed the first report of Diaporthe species on certain plants and provided strong evidence for the establishment of these novel species. This research expands our knowledge of taxonomy, host diversity, and the potential of medicinal plants for discovering new fungi.
During our investigations of the microfungi on medicinal plants in Thailand, five isolates of Diaporthe were obtained. These isolates were identified and described using a multiproxy approach, viz. morphology, cultural characteristics, host association, the multiloci phylogeny of ITS, tef1-& alpha;, tub2, cal, and his3, and DNA comparisons. Five new species, Diaporthe afzeliae, D. bombacis, D. careyae, D. globoostiolata, and D. samaneae, are introduced as saprobes from the plant hosts, viz. Afzelia xylocarpa, Bombax ceiba, Careya sphaerica, a member of Fagaceae, and Samanea saman. Interestingly, this is the first report of Diaporthe species on these plants, except on the Fagaceae member. The morphological comparison, updated molecular phylogeny, and pairwise homoplasy index (PHI) analysis strongly support the establishment of novel species. Our phylogeny also revealed the close relationship between D. zhaoqingensis and D. chiangmaiensis; however, the evidence from the PHI test and DNA comparison indicated that they are distinct species. These findings improve the existing knowledge of taxonomy and host diversity of Diaporthe species as well as highlight the untapped potential of these medicinal plants for searching for new fungi.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据