4.5 Article

Carbon nanoparticles-Fe(II) complex for efficient theranostics of xenografted colonic tumor

期刊

CANCER NANOTECHNOLOGY
卷 14, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12645-023-00196-5

关键词

Carbon nanoparticles; Ferrous iron; Antitumor activity; Ferroptosis; Magnetic resonance imaging

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study demonstrates that carbon nanoparticle-Fe(II) complex (CNSI-Fe) induces intracellular iron accumulation and can be visualized in tumors. CNSI-Fe inhibits tumor growth and increases the lifespan of colon tumor-bearing mice through the promotion of apoptosis and ferroptosis. The transcriptome analysis reveals the impact of CNSI-Fe on ferroptosis and inflammation signaling pathways. CNSI-Fe shows low toxicity and holds potential for clinical applications.
BackgroundOverwhelming Fe accumulation in tumor arouses strong oxidative stress. To benefit the cancer patients, Fe(II) delivered by carbon nanoparticles-Fe(II) complex (CNSI-Fe) should be visualized to ensure the successful intratumoral injection and the antitumor mechanisms should be investigated at molecular level.ResultsIntracellular Fe accumulations associating with the uptakes of CNSI-Fe were observed both in vitro and in vivo. The retention of Fe(II) in tumor over 72 h was visualized by magnetic resonance imaging. CNSI-Fe inhibited the tumor growth and expanded the lifespan of colonic tumor-bearing mice. The antitumor activity of CNSI-Fe was attributed to the increases of OH radicals and the oxidative stress in tumor cells, which resulted in cell apoptosis and ferroptosis. The transcriptome analyses confirmed the changes of ferroptosis and inflammation signaling pathways by CNSI-Fe treatment. The low toxicity of CNSI-Fe was indicated by the serum biochemistry, hematology, and histopathology.ConclusionCNSI-Fe induced the efficient apoptosis and ferroptosis of colonic tumor for cancer therapy. Our results would benefit the clinical applications of CNSI-Fe and stimulate great interest in the nanomedicine.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据