4.7 Review

Abscopal Effect on Bone Metastases from Solid Tumors: A Systematic Review and Retrospective Analysis of Challenge within a Challenge

期刊

BIOMEDICINES
卷 11, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines11041157

关键词

abscopal effect; radiotherapy; bone scintigraphy; bone metastases

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The abscopal effect (AE) refers to the ability of radiotherapy (RT) to induce immune-mediated responses in nonirradiated distant metastases. Bone metastases (BMs) are common and provide an immunologically favorable environment for cancer cell proliferation. This study reviewed the literature and evaluated the incidence of AE involving BMs in patients receiving palliative RT.
Background: Abscopal effect (AE) describes the ability of radiotherapy (RT) to induce immune-mediated responses in nonirradiated distant metastasis. Bone represents the third most frequent site of metastasis and an immunologically favorable environment for the proliferation of cancer cells. We revised the literature, searching documented cases of AE involving bone metastases (BMs) and evaluated the incidence of AE involving BMs in patients requiring palliative RT on BMs or non-BMs treated at our department. Methods: Articles published in the PubMed/MEDLINE database were selected using the following search criteria: ((abscopal effect)) AND ((metastases)). Patients with BMs, who underwent performed bone scintigraphy before and at least 2-3 months after RT, were selected and screened between January 2015 and July 2022. AE was defined as an objective response according to the scan bone index for at least one nonirradiated metastasis at a distance > 10 cm from the irradiated lesion. The primary endpoint was the rate of AE on BMs. Results: Ten cases experiencing AE of BMs were identified from the literature and eight among our patients. Conclusions: The analysis performed here suggests the use of hypofractionated radiotherapy as the only triggering factor for AE of BMs through the activation of the immune response.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据