4.6 Article

Mutations Status of NOTCH Signaling Pathway Predict Prognosis of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Colorectal Cancer

期刊

JOURNAL OF INFLAMMATION RESEARCH
卷 16, 期 -, 页码 1693-1709

出版社

DOVE MEDICAL PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.2147/JIR.S394894

关键词

NOTCH; CRC; ICIs; biomarker; tumour microenvironment

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found that the status of NOTCH pathway mutation is closely associated with the efficacy of immunotherapy in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients, and it may serve as a novel biomarker and therapeutic target for CRC.
Purpose: In recent years, tumour immunotherapy has ushered in a new era of oncology treatment. However, the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in the treatment of CRC remains limited. There is an urgent clinical need for precise biomarkers that can aid in the screening and treatment of CRC subtypes. Therefore, we focused on the NOTCH pathway mutation status and conducted a systematic analysis for its predictive value of ICI therapy efficacy.Methods: We collected mutational and clinical data from cohorts of CRC patients treated with ICIs. The relationship between NOTCH pathway mutations (NOTCH-MT) and CRC immunotherapy prognosis was analysed using univariate and multivariate Cox regression models. CRC cohort data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database were combined to obtain a comprehensive overview of immunogenicity and tumour microenvironment (TME) differences among different NOTCH pathway mutation statuses.Results: We observed greater infiltration of M1 macrophages, CD8+ T cells, neutrophils, and activated natural killer (NK) cells with NOTCH-MT status. Immunogenicity was also significantly higher in patients with NOTCH-MT, as were tumour mutational burden (TMB), neoantigen load (NAL), and the number of mutations in DNA damage repair (DDR) pathways.Conclusion: NOTCH-MT status was strongly associated with the prognosis of CRC patients treated with ICIs and is expected to serve as a novel biomarker and therapeutic target for CRC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据