4.6 Article

Legacy and emerging per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances in polar regions

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cogsc.2023.100840

关键词

Per-and poly-fluorinated alkyl substances Arctic Antarctica Long-range transport Atmosphere Seawater Sea ice Snow Biota

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Per-and poly-fluorinated alkyl substances (PFASs) have been found to be ubiquitous in the pristine polar environment, and are transported to the Arctic and Antarctic through long-range pathways such as oceanic currents and atmosphere. Novel PFASs, such as hexafluoropropylene oxide dimer acid and fluorotelomer sul-fonates (6:2 and 8:2 FTS), have been identified in these regions as replacements for PFOS and PFOA. The spatial distribution of PFASs shows declining trends from continental sources to the polar oceans, with coastal areas in the Arctic and Antarctic having elevated concentrations, indicating secondary sources of PFASs from glacier melting and sea ice retreat.
Per-and poly-fluorinated alkyl substances (PFASs) have been investigated in various environmental compartments in the Arctic and Antarctica. Available data indicated that PFASs are ubiquitous and constitute one group of 'forever chemicals' in the pristine polar environment. Long-range environmental transport with oceanic currents and atmosphere are major pathways in which PFAS reach polar regions. Novel PFASs have been identified in the Arctic and Antarctic, such as hexafluoropropylene oxide dimer acid and fluorotelomer sul-fonates (6:2 and 8:2 FTS), although these alternatives have just been produced as replacements of perfluorooctane sul-fonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) for a few years. Spatial distribution of PFASs showed declining trends from the continental sources to the polar oceans, suggesting ongoing discharge and transport processes. Elevated con-centrations of PFAS often occur in the coastal areas of the Arctic and Antarctica, highlighting glacier melting and sea ice retreat act as secondary sources of PFASs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据