Challenges and Solutions to the Measurement of Neurocognitive Mechanisms in Developmental Settings

Identifying early neurocognitive mechanisms that confer risk for mental health problems is one important avenue as we seek to develop successful early interventions. Currently, however, we have limited understanding of the neurocognitive mechanisms involved in shaping mental health trajectories from childhood through young adulthood, and this constrains our ability to develop effective clinical interventions. In particular, there is an urgent need to develop more sensitive, reliable, and scalable measures of individual differences for use in developmental settings. In this review, we outline methodological shortcomings that explain why widely used task-based measures of neu-rocognition currently tell us little about mental health risk. We discuss specific challenges that arise when studying neurocognitive mechanisms in developmental settings, and we share suggestions for overcoming them. We also propose a novel experimental approach-which we refer to as cognitive microscopy-that involves adaptive design optimization, temporally sensitive task administration, and multilevel modeling. This approach addresses some of the methodological shortcomings outlined above and provides measures of stability, variability, and developmental change in neurocognitive mechanisms within a multivariate framework.

Automated summary

Currently, there is limited understanding of the early neurocognitive mechanisms involved in shaping mental health trajectories from childhood through young adulthood, highlighting the need for more sensitive and reliable individual differences measures. To overcome methodological shortcomings, a novel experimental approach called cognitive microscopy is proposed, which includes adaptive design optimization, temporally sensitive task administration, and multilevel modeling to provide measures of stability, variability, and developmental change in neurocognitive mechanisms within a multivariate framework.