4.4 Review

In vitro modeling of the neurobiological effects of glucocorticoids: A review

期刊

NEUROBIOLOGY OF STRESS
卷 23, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ynstr.2023.100530

关键词

Stress; Stress disorders; Glucocorticoids; In vitro models; Psychiatry; Neurobiology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

HPA axis dysregulation is implicated in stress-related disorders and the release of glucocorticoids is associated with neurobiological changes that contribute to negative consequences of chronic stress and psychiatric disorders. In vitro studies investigating the effects of glucocorticoids on various neuronal processes provide insights into the pathophysiology of stress-related psychiatric disorders.
Hypothalamic-pituitary adrenal (HPA)axis dysregulation has long been implicated in stress-related disorders such as major depression and post-traumatic stress disorder. Glucocorticoids (GCs) are released from the adrenal glands as a result of HPA-axis activation. The release of GCs is implicated with several neurobiological changes that are associated with negative consequences of chronic stress and the onset and course of psychiatric disorders. Investigating the underlying neurobiological effects of GCs may help to better understand the pathophysiology of stress-related psychiatric disorders. GCs impact a plethora of neuronal processes at the genetic, epigenetic, cellular, and molecular levels. Given the scarcity and difficulty in accessing human brain samples, 2D and 3D in vitro neuronal cultures are becoming increasingly useful in studying GC effects. In this review, we provide an overview of in vitro studies investigating the effects of GCs on key neuronal processes such as proliferation and survival of progenitor cells, neurogenesis, synaptic plasticity, neuronal activity, inflammation, genetic vulnerability, and epigenetic alterations. Finally, we discuss the challenges in the field and offer suggestions for improving the use of in vitro models to investigate GC effects.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据