4.7 Article

Histological transformation to gliosarcoma with combined BRAF/MEK inhibition in BRAF V600E mutated glioblastoma

期刊

NPJ PRECISION ONCOLOGY
卷 7, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41698-023-00398-5

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The identification of BRAF V600 mutation and the development of combined BRAF and MEK targeting agents have made significant impact on tissue-agnostic precision oncology therapies. However, resistance can occur and it is important to identify potential resistance mechanisms. We report a case of recurrent glioblastoma that initially responded to treatment but later developed resistance through histological transformation and acquisition of additional mutations.
The identification of BRAF V600 mutation in multiple cancers beyond melanoma and the development of combined BRAF and MEK targeting agents have altered the landscape of tissue-agnostic precision oncology therapies with an impact on survival outcomes. Despite initial efficacy, resistance emerges, and it is pertinent to identify putative resistance mechanisms. We report a case of recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) harboring BRAF V600E alteration who initially responded to combined BRAF + MEK inhibition and subsequently developed treatment resistance by histological transformation to gliosarcoma and acquisition of oncogenic KRAS(G12D)and an NF1(L1083R) mutation. This documented case represents an initial evidence of a developing phenomenon in cancer research as it provides the first evidence of an emergent KRAS G12D/NF1 L1083R aberration with histological transformation occurring concurrently with primary BRAF V600E-altered glioblastoma as a previously unrecognized acquired mechanism of resistance in the setting of combined BRAF and MEK inhibition. This novel finding not only sheds new light on the RAS/MAPK pathway but also highlights the potential for morphological transformation to gliosarcoma, underscoring the critical need for further investigation in this area.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据